📢 Gate Square #Creator Campaign Phase 2# is officially live!
Join the ZKWASM event series, share your insights, and win a share of 4,000 $ZKWASM!
As a pioneer in zk-based public chains, ZKWASM is now being prominently promoted on the Gate platform!
Three major campaigns are launching simultaneously: Launchpool subscription, CandyDrop airdrop, and Alpha exclusive trading — don’t miss out!
🎨 Campaign 1: Post on Gate Square and win content rewards
📅 Time: July 25, 22:00 – July 29, 22:00 (UTC+8)
📌 How to participate:
Post original content (at least 100 words) on Gate Square related to
A bold statement about DeFi AI: Do not attempt to manage our assets that we cannot afford to lose with an AI that cannot be fully controlled before its security has been verified.
1. As a heavy user of AI, my personal feeling is that you can have AI help you do things, but you can never fully trust it. Because you don't know what strange problems might arise due to hallucinations. However, asset management security and trust are the prerequisites for everything.
2. I guess those so-called fully automated AI DeFi Bots have a high risk of being exploited by clever people. The security pitfalls of DeFi itself are already numerous, and adding the new 'black box' of AI further amplifies the risk!
3. The black box decision-making of AI makes risk control even more difficult. Although there are prompts, it is also hard to achieve complete control. Black box decisions, high leverage, uncontrollable chain reactions... just thinking about this combination is exciting.
4. Of course, technology will always advance, and security issues may eventually be alleviated. But I guess this is likely to be driven by repeated painful "tuition fees." I hope that the ones paying the tuition are not you and me.
5. Decision-making at the transaction level is purely narrative and funding-driven, and may have little to do with what was mentioned above.
The above is purely a logical perspective and does not target any specific project.
#BTC # AI